. According to Standards I(B)–Independence and Objectivity and V(A)–Diligence and Reasonable Basis, members and candidates must exercise diligence, independence, objectivity, and thoroughness in analyzing investments, making investment recommen- dations, and taking investment actions. Changing a written recommendation to what a subject company desires is not acting diligently, independently, objectively, and/or thoroughly, and the analyst should immediately revise her recommendation to express her stated opinion of the company.
Changing a written recommendation to what a subject company desires is not acting diligently, independently, objectively, and/or thoroughly.

Swift’s functional currency is the AUD because sales are generated in AUD and the company operates within the competitive and regulatory environment of Australia. Under IFRS, when the subsidiary’s functional currency is the local currency, translations are done using the current rate method. Thus, Swift will use the current rate method for converting its financial statements.
The use of the current rate method depends on the identification of the functional currency, not on the local currency. Translations from the functional currency to the presentation currency is done using the current rate method. The local currency has an impact on translation only where it differs from the functional currency. In these cases, the translation from the local to the functional currency is done using the temporal method.
Swift’s functional currency is the AUD, not the USD, because sales are generated in AUD and the company operates within the competitive and regulatory environment of Australia. If it were the USD this answer would be correct.

The change in revenue recognition to an earlier point, before the product has been produced or delivered, is an aggressive accounting policy that would lower the company’s quality of earnings.
The change in the warranty expense reflects updated information, and failure to act on it would underestimate earnings.
The stock grants are expensed over the estimated service life of the employees, in this case the 3 years till it vests, and does not distort the quality of earnings.

. Cash flow from operations (CFO) already reflects changes in working capital items, therefore Paschel’s first comment is correct. EBITDA has the non-cash charges of depreciation and amortization added back, so Covey’s statement is incorrect, not all non-cash charges will need to be added back. Net borrowing is added back for FCFE not FCFF, so Paschel’s second statement is incorrect.
. Depreciation has already been added back to EBITDA, though there may be other items that still need to be added back.
. Adjusting for net borrowing is not necessary for FCFF (just FCFE).

. Find prices one period from the end. Value at Year 2:
0.5 × [(104/1.0450) + (104/1.0450)] + 4 = 103.522 0.5 × [(104/1.0325) + (104/1.0325)] + 4 = 104.726 0.5 × [(104/1.0235) + (104/1.0235)] + 4 = 105.612
Find prices two periods from the end. Time 1 values are the average of Time 2 dis- counted plus the coupon payment.
0.5 × [(103.522/1.0360) + (104.726/1.0360)] + 4 = 104.506
0.5 × [(104.726/1.0260) + (105.612/1.0260)] + 4 = 106.504
Find prices at Time 0. There is no coupon paid in this node.
0.5 × [(104.506/1.029) + (106.504/1.029)] = 102.532
because the discount rate used is an average across time.
because the calculation omits the 4 coupon in the last period.